Friday, May 22, 2020

Is Abortion Morally Acceptable - 852 Words

All around the world, unborn babies are being killed everyday. Abortion has become one of the most common operations in the US today. People that are â€Å"pro-choice† believe that it is acceptable for a woman to have the choice to abort her baby or not. They say that it is the legal right of a woman. They believe that a baby is not yet alive until it has been born. It is argued that a woman should be able to do what is best for her future, health, and body. On the other side of the spectrum lies people that are â€Å"pro-life†. They believe that human life begins at the time of conception and that killing what is unborn is murder. They defend this with arguments from science, as well as scripture. Pro-choice believes in abortion because it will benefit the majority of women and possibly families. They are looking out for themselves and their best interests. It is Utilitarianism as well as egoism. They believe it is morally acceptable to end the life of the unborn. It will provide the majority with an unwanted pregnancy and a way out of a tough situation. Pro-life is against abortion because of a religious authority and because it will benefit a majority (unborn babies). They believe it is morally unacceptable to end the life of the unborn. I strongly believe that abortion is wrong. I believe that it is murder. I am appalled and disgusted at the methods to abortion. With the suction and aspiration method, a vacuum rips apart the baby and sucks the pieces into aShow MoreRelatedAbortion Is Morally And Morally Acceptable2553 Words   |  11 PagesAbortion. Just hearing that word causes many different opinions, that topic has causes many debates, arguments and disagreements. When it comes to deciding if abortion is morally acceptable or not, is a decision that is hard to make. There are different circumstances that can cause someone to decide whether or not abortion is morally acceptable. Throughout this paper, the goal is to co nvince a reader that abortion is wrong in any circumstance and it is murder. While it is understood that someRead MoreAbortion : Is It Morally Acceptable?1640 Words   |  7 Pagesthis child technically alive? Is it morally acceptable to terminate this child? These are the main questions of the abortion debate that provides the basis for each side’s argument. On one end of the debate are the pro-choice arguers who believe life begins at birth and that women should have the right to choose what they do with their pregnancy. On the other end are the pro-life arguers who go against pro-choice believers. The pro-life side seeks to abolish abortion due to their belief that life beginsRead MoreAbortion Analytical Essay1139 Words   |  5 PagesAbortions: Morally Acceptable or Not? The issue of abortion is one of the most sensitive and controversial issues faced by modern societies. This issue leads to topics of whether abortion is right or wrong, if it is the actual killing of a person, and what actually defines the moral status of a fetus. In this paper, I will be arguing against Bonnie Steinbock, who believes that abortions are morally acceptable. So I will be supporting the view that abortions are not morally acceptable. In BonnieRead MoreAbortion : The Morality Of Abortion1442 Words   |  6 Pagesthe morality of abortion, or the ending of a pregnancy without physically giving birth to an infant. Often times abortions are categorized into either spontaneous, a natural miscarriage; induced or intentional, which is premeditated and for any reason; or therapeutic, which albeit intentional, its sole purpose is to save the mother’s life. It seems however that moral conflicts on issue mainly arise when discussing induced abortions. In general, people universally agree it is morally wrong to kill anRead MoreA Defense of Abortion by Judith Jarvis Thomson1354 Words   |  5 PagesJudith Jarvis Thomson proposes her argument in her article, A Defense of Abortion. There, she explains to her readers during what circumstances is abortion justifiable. Thomson uses the argument by analogy strategy to explain to her readers her argument. She tries to reach her conclusion by comparing it to similar cases. Th e point she is trying to make is to tell her readers that abortion is morally permissible only in some cases, like when the mother has been a victim of rape, when contraceptionRead MoreSince the foundation of morality, people have always lived their life by code. A code that suggests1200 Words   |  5 Pagesgenerally similar moral teachings on a number of moral issues, including; abortion, homosexuality and life after death. Although they have subtle differences, the moral teachings of abortion, homosexuality and life after death in Judaism and Buddhism are fundamentally the same. It is morally taught throughout Judaism that abortion is not forbidden, but expected to be considered only in serious conditions. When considering an abortion, the Jewish law requires the mother to consult and discuss with aRead MoreSummary Of The Defense Of Abortion By Judith Jarvis Thomson1175 Words   |  5 Pages In her article, â€Å"The Defense of Abortion†, Judith Jarvis Thomson states an analogy involving a violinist. She first states that you are allowed to unplug yourself in the violinist scenario, second abortion after rape is analogous to the violinist scenario, therefore, you should be allowed to unplug yourself and be allowed to abort after rape (Chwang, Abortion slide 12). In this paper, I will argue that abortion is morally acceptable even if the fetus is considered a person. This paper will criticizeRead MoreWhen Is Abortion Morally Appropriate?1124 Words   |  4 Pagesever, is Abortion Morally Appropriate? ONE: Introduction Abortion is one of the most contentious, controversial subjects in society today. There are strong arguments on both sides. The pro-life side of the issue is against abortion and many within that group are opposed to abortion even in the event that the woman in question has been raped and the so-called pro-choice position on the issue insists it is up to the woman do either keep the baby of opt for an abortion. When is an abortion morallyRead MoreAbortion is an important heath topic that is highly controversial globally. Politicians to health1600 Words   |  7 PagesAbortion is an important heath topic that is highly controversial globally. Politicians to health practitioners argue daily the legal and moral validity of the removal of a developing child while it is still in the womb. Although it’s been practiced for hundreds (if not thousands, if you trace it back to the Code of Hammurabi, ca. 1760 BCE) of years around the world, the U.S. legalized abortion in the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision in 1973. That has not stopped the countless arguments acrossRead MoreIs Abortion Morally Wrong?1397 Words   |  6 PagesAbortion is viewed as an ethical issue worldwide as it has many debates which causes question: Should it be considered morally ethical or not? Should it be legal or illegal? Is it wrong, is it, right? In addition to multiple theories: Beliefs, Morality, Logic, Science and many others. Some argue that abortion is morally wrong because it has a right to life. While the opposing view believe that its morally correct because it holds no right to life. The text â€Å"The Deliberately Induced Abortion of

Thursday, May 7, 2020

The Pros and Cons of Ethnic Identification Essay - 914 Words

Many circumstances oblige people to move from their native country to a foreign one. From this movement of migration have emerged many ethnic groups. An ethnic group is a restraint number of persons living in a larger society and sharing the same distinct cultural heritage. Some people tend to bury their habits and accommodate to the new way of life. However others hold on to their identity and try to identify their race and maintain it. This enriches societies and makes them multi-racial. Therefore, every ethnic group is essential to complete the mosaic. Although they are sometimes threatened, minorities must fight to preserve their principles. Why must they fight? Because racial identification has many positive impacts on the members.†¦show more content†¦In fact, the higher is the level of racial self-esteem, the higher becomes the level of personal self-esteem. Adolescents in particular need to feel that the society accepts them as they are with their distinct identity. They can’t be comfortable nor have a good attitude unless they find that their race is taken into consideration. Moral comfort confers to ethnic youth purpose and impetus. They work hard to achieve their goals and reach their ambitions. Not to mention that minorities occupy the same area and support each other. They exploit different resources and contribute to the economical development. The best example is the Armenians in Lebanon. They have ritualized their history by transmitting their food habits and their mother tongue. In addition, individuals identify clearly with the heritage of the group through religious beliefs and social values. If their culture doesn’t allow a specific behavior, they stick to the tradition. In fact, Garnier and Stein (1998) found that adolescents who had a stronger commitment to traditional values were less likely to engage in drug use while those who were committed to non-traditional values were at greater risk for drug use. Furthermore, minorities teach others how to be close enough. Their sense of belonging is incredibly high because they know that only their neighbors are remaining from their race. They share the same interests and would take risks to help their left-overs persevere. On the other hand, thisShow MoreRelatedPol 201 Week 5 Bd Essay1370 Words   |  6 Pagesdebate because it deals with using human embryos which violates pro-life politician’s conservative backgrounds. Pro-choice candidates therefore approve of stem cell research on the ground that it is a woman’s choice to provide the embryo for research purposes. Most republicans are pro-life and therefore are against stem cell research, but Mitt Romney is for stem research as long as it does not involve human cloning. The Democratic Party is pro-choice and therefore for stem cell research. Libertarians believeRead MoreAcademia Barilla1071 Words   |  5 Pagesan ongoing need for convenience. The number of â€Å"non-authentic† Italian products sold confirmed the high potential of the market. ïÆ'   Increasing trend toward high-quality products and customer services Growing attention for traditional cuisine and ethnic food trend ïÆ'   new channels, new countries ïÆ'   nonfood products that supported the Italian lifestyle ïÆ'   e-commerce Threat ïÆ'   Fast-food consumption is relatively high in the U.S.. ïÆ'   Counter-cyclical products: normally counter-cyclical to the overallRead MoreCommunication And How It Affects Nursing As A Profession1470 Words   |  6 Pagesin which information, a person’s thoughts, and feelings are shared. To become an ultimate professional in a field, such as nursing, it is vital to be able to communicate well with peers and clients. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the pros and cons, societal issues, promotion of change, and other pertinent issues that relates to communication and how it affects nursing as a profession. Communication is the foundation of how humans are able to interact amongst each other with the goal ofRead MoreEssay on The Pros and Cons of Abortion in Todays Society1159 Words   |  5 Pages as Hippocratic Oath. The controversy occurs every time some people cannot accept the right of the woman to have an abortion due to medical implications, and her unwillingness to induce abortion due to her religious beliefs. Abortion: Pros and Cons Pros and cons of abortions can be discussed with regard to different perspectives and stakeholders involved, but it will certainly remain the issue that cannot be perceived in a single-sided way. A multifaceted approach to study on abortion can helpRead MoreMy Summer At An Indian Call Center1588 Words   |  7 Pagestradition known among Hispanic communities, talks about the issue of redefining original tradition and cultural identity. In her article, â€Å"Selections from Once Upon a Quinceanera†, she touches on various aspects of Quinceanera, pointing out its pros and cons, extending the meaning of preserving cultures and redefining traditions. Changing cultural habits for certain purposes and redefining cultural traditions bring about the dilemma of cultural identifying. Although cultural assimilation is emergingRead MoreBuilding a Coalition Essay1739 Words   |  7 Pagesway they do and predict their general behavioral patterns for the nearest future. Being able to predi ct the way the group will develop makes it possible to allocate resources reasonably and maximize group’s productivity. Part II: Problem Identification The coalition needs to form an executive development team which will be functional within the long period of time and include the members of all three parties involved - the Woodson foundation itself, the school system representativesRead MoreHealth And Health Care Of African American1264 Words   |  6 Pagescultural difference diet and exercise such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, stroke, end stage renal disease, dementia, diabetes, and certain cancers. Especially, diabetes has more frequency reason of death among Black elders than in other ethnic people except American Indians (Health and Health Care of African American , n.d). In addition, according to the Health and Health Care of African American (n.d.), the death rate for all cancers is 30% higher for African Americans than for WhitesRead MoreRacial Profiling Is Wrong Or Wrong?1826 Words   |  8 Pagesblack community sub servant them. Thus, they established Jim Crow laws and created negative stereotypes about black men and women. The idea of a vicious, dangerous and crooked black man gave life to the current racial profiling that exists today. The pros of the racial profiling of American citizens come from the common theme of wanting to know what group of people commit certain types of crimes. This can only be found by using statistics in order to properly come up with a logical hypothesis as toRead MoreFunctions Of Human Resource Management1632 Words   |  7 Pageswomen and minorities in the private sector to determine if organization are complying with EEO obligation and diversity objectives. The commissions also seek identification of noteworthy, creative or innovative organization in this area. EEO and Affirmative Action, Today, the EEOC enforces laws that prohibit discrimination based on ethnic background, religion, sex, national origin, disability, or age. These laws apply not only to employee recruitment and selection, but to other human resourcesRead MoreThe Law And Its Effect On Business1645 Words   |  7 Pagesfor the new business. After the creation of the account, the entrepreneur is therefore required to deposit the initial start-up capital into the account and obtained a receipt. This receipt is then added with other certified documents such as identification card, leased contract, site map, etc. Compiling these documents can take months or even years simply because of over bureaucracy and bribery and corruption. The law protects businesses from expropriation and should in case of any expropriation

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

The Genealogy of Morals Free Essays

The philosophical works The Genealogy of Morals, by Friedrich Nietzsche provides the reader with an opinion on what human morality means. The following paper will explore Neitzche’s l as implementation of analysis for his philosophy.   In Neitzche’s The Genealogy of Morals the concept of humanity and the way in which God produced or created humanity and gave them certain attributes of good or evil will also be represented in this paper. We will write a custom essay sample on The Genealogy of Morals or any similar topic only for you Order Now    In fact, the basis of Neitzche’s writing is about good and evil and the way in which humanity, history, religion, and philosophy have created, or manipulated these concepts to fit their own devices. Nietzsche restricts the presence of God in his equation by saying that the concepts of good and evil have changed with the progression of history and that these two paradigms of human behavior and secular code will continue to evolve toward the demands of a changing society. Nietzsche, therefore, makes the argument that morals are constructs of the times in which we will and have evolved much as human beings have over the ages, but that this is not necessarily a good thing because it is meant as a manner of preventing others from having control over us. This is because people inherently wish to exercise power over others and morals are a way of leveling things off so that the strongest members of society do not dominate, as Nietzsche emphasizes, The pathos of nobility and distance, as mentioned, the lasting and domineering feeling, something total and complete, of a higher ruling nature in relation to a lower nature, to an â€Å"beneath†Ã¢â‚¬â€that is the origin of the opposition between â€Å"good† and â€Å"bad.† (The right of the master to give names extends so far that we could permit ourselves to grasp the origin of language itself as an expression of the power of the rulers: they say â€Å"that is such and such,† seal every object and event with a sound and, in so doing, take possession of it.) In the Genealogy of Morals, Friedrich Nietzsche presents his idea about the morality of human beings and why it is flawed: Nietzsche begins by discounting many of society’s assumptions on how they function in life, as he believes that we tend to view things as having inherent meanings But all purposes, all uses, are only signs that a will to power has become master over something with less power and has stamped on it its own meaning of some function, and the entire history of a â€Å"thing,† an organ, a practice can by this process be seen as a continuing chain of signs of constantly new interpretations and adjustments, whose causes need not be connected to each other—they rather follow and take over from each other under merely contingent circumstances. Nietzsche uses punishment as an example in this case, as human beings tend to believe that punishment is an action that happens to a person as a result of that person doing something that he or she deserves to be punished, although counter to this Nietzsche also states that suffering is meaningless and therefore, punishment may also with Nietzche’s own philosophy be meaningless. He would argue that punishment is completely separate from this, however, as punishment is very often used as a way of showing off one’s power or in some cases, as an act of cruelty. This suggests that the punishment does not always fit the crime, as the clichà © is written, so those two things should not necessarily be associated with each other. It cannot be understood how these two things are the same thing, so it is necessary to keep them separate. Nietzsche then continues this argument to show how morality has arrived at the point that it is at right now. He believes that morals have become such an important thing in a person’s life because they have very sacred reasons for having these morals, which include religion, culture, and reason. These, morals, however, are flawed because what constitutes a good, bad, or evil act can change over the course of history in a social morality as situations change because there is no absolute truth to them. What this means is that an action could be considered either good or bad depending on the situation, so it is impossible for morals to be considered absolute as well. Nietzsche, rather than defining good and bad, looks at what helps to define what shape an action will take over the course of our lives. Nietzsche argues that all of existence, especially in human beings, is a struggle between different wills for the feeling of power. This means that society wishes to have some sort of control over their own lives and also over the lives of others. This is why competition and the nature of this in man is so prevalent in society, Rather, that occurs for the first time with the collapse of aristocratic value judgments, when this entire contrast between â€Å"egoistic† and â€Å"unegoistic† pressed itself ever more strongly into human awareness—it is, to use my own words, the instinct of the herd which, through this contrast, finally gets its word (and its words). And even so, it took a long time until this instinct in the masses became ruler, with the result that moral evaluation got downright hung up and bogged down on this opposition (as is the case, for example, in modern Europe: today the prejudice that takes â€Å"moralistic,† â€Å"unegoistic,† â€Å"dà ©sintà ©ressà ©Ã¢â‚¬  [disinterested] as equally valuable ideas already governs, with the force of a â€Å"fixed idea† and a disease of the brain). It is all a competition to achieve this power, even if there is no physical reward for winning these competitions. Nietzsche shows the constant changing of the ideologies of good and bad by stating that in past generations, the concept of good was defined by the strongest people in society. In barbaric times, anything that the stronger members of society did was defined as good, while the weaker members of society were seen as bad. This is not something that we would agree upon today, but members of these past societies would not agree with the way we do things either. Therefore, Nietzsche believes that to give anything an absolute interpretation does not work because as the times change, so will this interpretation. It is wills which define this, so as wills change, so will the apparent truth. If it is truly desirable to have free will, therefore, a person must not believe in any absolutes, but rather view the world as a constantly changing place and let our wills define the things that are occurring around and in society. This includes looking at things from as many different perspectives as possible in order to decide contingently upon personal perspectives which viewpoint a person wishes to make. This can also be applied to morality as, since nothing is absolute, morals are constantly changing as well. Morality is not something that was passed down from God to human beings, but is rather something that has evolved and changed since the beginning of time and will continue to do so. The only thing that has not change in human beings is that they inherently have the desire to achieve more power over their fellow human beings, because of the existence of free wills. This means that the present morality that human beings possess has been born due to hatred for those things that are stronger in the presence of society. Nietzsche argues that a person will have fear of things that could possibly have power over them, so a person must have developed this moral code in order to protect themselves from the stronger members of society. Nietzsche believes that a person must embrace these animalistic instincts because a person is currently hurting themselves by repressing them. Nietzsche says that morals are a result of trying to deter others from having power.   The notion of human morality is something that philosophers have debates over for centuries and will continue to do so as society progresses as well as thoughts of absolutes and God evolve. Work Cited Neitzche, F.   Genealogy of Morals.   Dover Thrift Edition.   New York.   2003.                   How to cite The Genealogy of Morals, Essay examples